# Spring mass system simulink examples: Introduction: System Modeling

## Use the "varying parameter" feature of slTuner to create an array of closed-loop models over a grid of values covering their uncertainty ranges. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.

The zeros of the transfer function,are the roots of the numerator polynomial, i. Tutorials Commands Animations Extras.

Main Content. Search Support Support MathWorks.

Label this Step block "U".

Use the "varying parameter" feature of slTuner to create an array of closed-loop models over a grid of values covering their uncertainty ranges. Main Content.

## Related Examples

Toggle Main Navigation. The Simscape model uses physical connections, which permit a bidirectional flow of energy between components. Create an slTuner interface syatem tuning the "Controller" block in the Simulink model, and use systune to tune the PID gains and best meet the two requirements. Due to the presence of ureal components in the model, systune automatically tries to maximize performance over the entire uncertainty range.

These nonlinearities arise in many different ways, one of the most common in control systems being "saturation" in which an element of the system reaches a hard physical limit to its operation. Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. This equation, known as the governing equationcompletely characterizes the dynamic state of the system. Fortunately, as we shall see, these results have proven to be remarkably effective and many significant engineering challenges have been solved using LTI techniques. Connect its output to the remaining input of Mass 1's Add block with positive sign. In reality, nearly every physical system is nonlinear. When applying this equation, it is best to construct a free-body diagram FBD of the sysetm showing all of the applied forces.

No, overwrite the modified version Yes. No, simulink examples the modified version Yes. Off-Canvas Navigation Menu Toggle. The nominal response meets the response time requirement and looks good. But how robust is it to variations of? To answer this question, use the "block substitution" feature of slTuner to create an uncertain closed-loop model of the mass-spring-damper system. Here the uncertainty is specified as a percentage deviation from the nominal value.

Range 1 ,uk. You have a modified version of this example. The Simulink model uses the sydtem probable" or "nominal" values of :. Select web site. Off-Canvas Navigation Menu Toggle. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. This example shows how to robustly tune a PID controller for an uncertain mass-spring-damper system modeled in Simulink.

## Open Example

Toggle Main Navigation. Off-Canvas Navigation Menu Toggle. Documentation Help Center Documentation. Position should track a step change with a 1 second response time Filter coefficient in PID controller should not exceed Filter coefficient in PID controller should not exceed

Observe the significant performance degradation for some parameter combinations, with poorly damped oscillations and a long settling time. The initial deflection for the spring is 1 meter. Search Support Support MathWorks. Block substitution lets you specify the linearization of a particular block in a Simulink model.

Now, we will add in the forces acting on each mass. Connect the output of this Add block Damper 2's force to the fifth input of Mass 2's Add block. Often when choosing state variables it is helpful to consider what variables capture the energy stored in the system. Tutorials Commands Animations Extras.

For further insight, plot the performance index maximum value of the "soft" tuning goals Req1,Req2 as a function of the uncertain parameters for the nominal damping. Tuning this PID controller is easy when the physical parameters are known exactly. No, overwrite the modified version Yes. Soft: [1. Open Mobile Search. The nominal response meets the response time requirement and looks good.

## MATLAB Command

Spring mass system simulink examples robust systfm is only slightly worse than the nominal performance, but the same uncertain closed-loop simulation shows a significant improvement over the nominal design. Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. This plot shows that the nominal tuning is very sensitive to changes in mass or spring stiffnesswhile the robust tuning is essentially insensitive to these parameters. The Simulink model uses the "most probable" or "nominal" values of :. This example shows how to take such uncertainty into account during tuning to maintain high performance within the range of expected values for.

Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. The step plot shows the closed-loop response with the nominally tuned PID for 20 randomly selected values of in the specified uncertainty range. ControllerPoles 'Controller' ,0,0. Toggle Main Navigation. Open Mobile Search. Here we use two simple design requirements:.

ControllerPoles 'Controller' ,0,0. The nominally tuned PID excessively relies on "cancelling" notching out the plant resonance, which examplse not a robust strategy in the presence of uncertainty on the resonance frequency. This is confirmed by plotting the worst-case gain from to as a function of frequency. Select web site. Off-Canvas Navigation Menu Toggle. Here the uncertainty is specified as a percentage deviation from the nominal value. Based on your location, we recommend that you select:.

Select web site. But how robust is it to variations of? Search Support Support MathWorks. Search MathWorks. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location. ControllerPoles 'Controller' ,0,0.

Tap a line of the Step's output and connect it to the input of the Derivative block. Connect the output of this Gain block the spring force to the second input of the Mass 1 Add block. You can download a model file for the complete system by right clicking here and then selecting Save link as LTI systems have the extremely important property that if the input to the system is sinusoidal, then the output will also be sinusoidal with the same frequency as the input, but with possibly different magnitude and phase. Consequently, most of the results of control theory are based on these assumptions.

Dynamic systems are systems that change or evolve in time according to a fixed rule. The damper only dissipates energy, it doesn't store energy. This input is negative, similar to Spring 1's force on Mass 1. For instance, in a simple mechanical mass-spring-damper system, the two state variables could be the position and velocity of the mass. Enter the following commands into the m-file in which you defined the system parameters.

Physical connections make it possible to add further stages to the kass simply by using copy and paste. Position should track a step change with a 1 second response time. To answer this question, use the "block substitution" feature of slTuner to create an uncertain closed-loop model of the mass-spring-damper system. Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. Main Content. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers.

Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance. Due to the presence of ureal components in the model, systune automatically tries to maximize performance over the entire uncertainty range. The Simulink model uses the "most probable" or "nominal" values of :. Off-Canvas Navigation Menu Toggle.

Due to the presence of ureal components in the model, systune automatically tries to maximize performance over the entire uncertainty range. Documentation Help Center Documentation. Simulink Model of Mass-Spring-Damper System The mass-spring-damper depicted in Figure 1 is modeled by the second-order differential equation. For further insight, plot the performance index maximum value of the "soft" tuning goals Req1,Req2 as a function of the uncertain parameters for the nominal damping. Off-Canvas Navigation Menu Toggle. Search MathWorks.

**ALSO READ: Hypothyroidism And Endometrial Hyperplasia**

Use the "uncertain real" ureal object to model the range spring mass system simulink examples values that each parameter may take. The step plot shows the closed-loop response with the nominally tuned PID for 20 randomly selected values of in the specified uncertainty range. Open Mobile Search. No, overwrite the modified version Yes. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. To answer this question, use the "block substitution" feature of slTuner to create an uncertain closed-loop model of the mass-spring-damper system. Position should track a step change with a 1 second response time.

Range 1 ,um. Toggle Main Navigation. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Documentation Help Center Documentation. Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance. Here we use two simple design requirements:.

The Simulink model uses signal connections, which define how data spring mass system simulink examples from one block to another. For many physical systems, this rule can be stated as a set of first-order differential equations:. This is often a very reasonable assumption because the underlying physical laws themselves do not typically depend on time. In so doing, it also transforms the governing differential equation into an algebraic equation which is often easier to analyze. Insert a Derivative block from the Continuous library to the right of the W step block.

Newton's law for each of these masses can be expressed as:.

We can use a PID controller to generate the effort needed to change the position. The nominal response meets the response time requirement and looks good.

Connect the output of this Gain block the spring force to the second input of the Mass 1 Add block.

Connect the output of the Simulink examples block to the positive input of this Add block. Change the label of this Gain block to "Mass 1" by clicking on the word "Gain" underneath the block. This input is negative, similar to Spring 1's force on Mass 1. In fact, the true power of feedback control systems are that they work are robust in the presence of the unavoidable modeling uncertainty. Do you want to open this example with your edits? Physical connections make it possible to add further stages to the mass-spring-damper simply by using copy and paste. Designing an automotive suspension system is an interesting and challenging control problem.

You may want to resize the gain blocks to view the contents.

Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. Toggle Main Navigation.

If, for instance, we are interested in controlling the position of the mass, then the output equation is:.

Main Content.

We note that that the governing equation for the RLC circuit has an analogous form to the mass-spring-damper mechanical system. This input is positive since Spring 1 pulls up on Mass 2.

Toggle Main Navigation. Here we use two simple design requirements:. Toggle Main Navigation. To assess the robustness of the nominal tuning, apply the tuned PID gains to the untuned uncertain model UST0 and simulate the "uncertain" closed-loop response. Block substitution lets you specify the linearization of a particular block in a Simulink model. Do you want to open this example with your edits?

The poles of the transfer function,are the roots of the denominator polynomial, i. Now applying KVL around the loop and using the sign conventions indicated in the simulink examples, we arrive at the following governing equation. Edit its value to "b1" and label it "Damper 1". Finally, to view the output X1-X2 insert a Scope block from the Sinks library and connect it to the output of the rightmost Add block. LTI systems have the extremely important property that if the input to the system is sinusoidal, then the output will also be sinusoidal with the same frequency as the input, but with possibly different magnitude and phase.

We will assume a flat examplse surface for now. Fortunately, over a sufficiently small operating range think tangent line near a curvethe dynamics of most systems are approximately linear. Run the simulation Ctrl-T or Run from the Simulation menu. The first step in the control design process is to develop appropriate mathematical models of the system to be controlled.

This step could represent the vehicle coming out of a pothole. Connect the amss of this Add block Damper 2's force to the fifth input of Mass 2's Add block. Tap a line off Damper 1's force line and connect it to the first input which is positive of Mass 2's Add block. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Tap a line off this signal and connect it to the remaining input of Mass 2's Add block with negative sign. When the vehicle is experiencing any road disturbance i. Often when choosing state variables it is helpful to consider what variables capture the energy stored in the system.

However this is rarely the case in practice, due to a number of factors including imprecise measurements, manufacturing tolerances, changes in operating conditions, and wear and tear. First tune the PID controller for the nominal parameter values. Off-Canvas Navigation Menu Toggle. Range 1 ,um. Create an slTuner interface for tuning the "Controller" block in the Simulink model, and use systune to tune the PID gains and best meet the two requirements. Soft: [1.

Tutorials Commands Animations Extras. When the vehicle is experiencing any road disturbance i.

This is shown in the block annotations for the Spring and one of the Integrator blocks.

Tap a line off this signal and connect it to the remaining input of Mass 2's Add block with negative sign.

Insert a Gain block to the right of this Add block and connect the Add's output to the new Gain's input. Newton's laws of motion form the basis for analyzing mechanical systems.

The output matrix,is used to specify which state variables or combinations thereof are available for use by the controller.

Tap a exmples of the Step's output and connect it to the input of the Derivative block. Keep in mind that this is an estimation. System identification may be performed using either time-domain or frequency-domain data, see the Introduction: System Identification page for further details. Until the advent of digital computers and to a large extent thereafterit was only practical to analyze linear time-invariant LTI systems. Both the zeros and poles may be complex valued have both real and imaginary parts. In this case, the system of first-order differential equations can be represented as a matrix equation, that is. The spring force is proportional to the displacement of the mass,and the viscous damping force is proportional to the velocity of the mass.

Let's assign the following numerical values to each of the variables. Tutorials Contact. We will assume a flat road surface for now. This force is equal to a constant, k1 times the difference X1-X2. Keep in mind that this is an estimation.

This equation, known as the governing equationcompletely characterizes the dynamic state of the system. Search Support Support MathWorks. The road disturbance W in this problem will be simulated by a step input. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers.

Select a Web Site Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Documentation Help Center Documentation. Toggle Main Navigation. No, overwrite the modified version Yes. Range 1 ,uk.

Tuning this PID controller is sumulink when the physical parameters are known exactly. Here the uncertainty is specified as a percentage deviation from the nominal value. Spring mass system simulink examples this is rarely the case in practice, due to a number of factors including imprecise measurements, manufacturing tolerances, changes in operating conditions, and wear and tear. Due to the presence of ureal components in the model, systune automatically tries to maximize performance over the entire uncertainty range. Search MathWorks. Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance.

Toggle Main Navigation. The initial deflection for the spring is 1 meter. First tune the PID controller for the nominal parameter values.

To assess the robustness of the nominal tuning, apply the examples PID gains to the untuned uncertain model UST0 and simulate the "uncertain" closed-loop response. Do you want to open eimulink example with your edits? Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location. Block substitution lets you specify the linearization of a particular block in a Simulink model. Soft: [1. The robust performance is only slightly worse than the nominal performance, but the same uncertain closed-loop simulation shows a significant improvement over the nominal design. For further insight, plot the performance index maximum value of the "soft" tuning goals Req1,Req2 as a function of the uncertain parameters for the nominal damping.

A comparison of the two PID controllers shows similar behaviors except for one key difference. Main Content. Search MathWorks. Open Mobile Search. Search MathWorks.

ControllerPoles 'Controller' ,0,0. Off-Canvas Navigation Menu Toggle. Get trial now. Simulink Model of Mass-Spring-Damper System The mass-spring-damper depicted in Figure 1 is modeled by the second-order differential equation.

## More About

This amounts to minimizing the worst-case value of the "soft" tuning goals Req1 and Req2. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location. Select web site.

Do you want to open this example with your edits? Documentation Help Center Documentation. The Simulink model uses the "most probable" or "nominal" values of :. Here we use two simple design requirements:. Search Support Support MathWorks. Tuning this PID controller is easy when the physical parameters are known exactly.

Label this Step block "U". Finally, to view the output X1-X2 insert a Scope block from the Sinks library and connect it to the output of the rightmost Add block.

The step plot shows the closed-loop response with the nominally tuned PID for 20 randomly selected values of in the specified uncertainty range. Search MathWorks.

This system will be modeled by summing the forces acting on both masses body and suspension and integrating the accelerations of each mass twice to give velocities and positions.

Open Mobile Search. To simulate this system, first, an appropriate simulation time must be set.

Here we use this to replace the crisp values of by the uncertain values um,uc,uk defined above. No, overwrite the modified version Yes.

Syxtem state-space representation is found by choosing the charge on the capacitor and current through the circuit inductor as the state variables. Search MathWorks. In this section, we have seen how to model systems using basic physical principles; however, often this is not possible either because the parameters of the system are uncertain, or the underlying processes are simply not understood. Connect the Derivative's output to the positive input of the new Add block.

Documentation Help Center Documentation. Tuning this PID controller is easy when the physical parameters are known exactly. You have a modified version of this example. Search Support Support MathWorks.

## Open Example

Tuning this PID controller is easy when the physical parameters are known exactly. Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance. You have a modified version of this example. First tune the PID controller for the nominal parameter values.

For time-invariant systems, the parameters or coefficients of the function are constant. Newton's laws of motion form the basis simluink analyzing mechanical systems. The output equation, Equation 3is necessary because often there are state variables which are not directly observed or are otherwise not of interest. Note that we can also determine the transfer function directly from the state-space representation as follows:. The state at any future time,may be determined exactly given knowledge of the initial state,and the time history of the inputs,between and by integrating Equation 1.

**ALSO READ: Smoldering Myeloma Icd 10 Code For Hypothyroidism**

This example shows how to robustly tune a PID controller for an uncertain mass-spring-damper system modeled sysyem Simulink. Search Support Support MathWorks. Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. Simulink Model of Mass-Spring-Damper System The mass-spring-damper depicted in Figure 1 is modeled by the second-order differential equation. The nominally tuned PID excessively relies on "cancelling" notching out the plant resonance, which is not a robust strategy in the presence of uncertainty on the resonance frequency.

It is very rare in practice that you will have to directly evaluate a Laplace transform though spring mass system simulink examples should certainly know how to. These analogies and others like them turn out to be quite useful conceptually in understanding the behavior of dynamical systems. Enter the following commands into the m-file in which you defined the system parameters. Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. We will assume a flat road surface for now. This force also adds in with positive sign.

Connect the Derivative's output to the positive input of the new Add block. No, overwrite the modified version Yes. These nonlinearities arise in many different ways, one of the most common in control systems being "saturation" in which an element of the system reaches a hard physical limit to its operation. Insert an Add block after the upper pair of integrators. The system Gain is.

Spring mass system simulink examples Mobile Search. Exaamples input is negative, similar to Spring 1's force on Mass 1. When applying this equation, it is best to construct a free-body diagram FBD of the sysetm showing all of the applied forces. You may want to resize the gain blocks to view the contents. Tap a line off the "v2" line and connect it to the negative input of this Add block.

The step plot shows the spring mass system simulink examples response with the nominally tuned PID for 20 randomly selected values of in the specified uncertainty range. Position should track a step change with a 1 second response time. Open Mobile Search. Observe the significant performance degradation for some parameter combinations, with poorly damped oscillations and a long settling time. You have a modified version of this example.

This is shown in the block annotations for the Spring and one of the Integrator blocks. Do you want to open this example with your edits? Range 1 ,um. The initial deflection for the spring is 1 meter.

Insert a Step block from the Sources library in the upper left of the model window. Search Support Support MathWorks. The Simulink model uses signal connections, which define how data flows from one block to another.

Observing the above, we would like to improve the response of the suspension through the control of the suspension control force U. Documentation Help Center Documentation. Spribg an Integrator block from the Continuous library and draw lines to and from its input and output terminals. Since there is no existing signal representing the derivative of W we will need to generate this signal. The initial deflection for the spring is 1 meter. Edit its value to "b1" and label it "Damper 1".

For time-invariant systems, the parameters or coefficients of the function are constant.

Use the "uncertain real" ureal object to model the range of values that each parameter may take.

When the vehicle is experiencing any road disturbance i. Now we will add in the force from Spring 2.

Newton's law for each of these masses can be expressed as:.

Filter coefficient in PID controller should not exceed A comparison of the two PID controllers shows similar behaviors except for one key difference. ControllerPoles 'Controller' ,0,0. Open Mobile Search. You have a modified version of this example. Search Support Support MathWorks. The robust performance is only slightly worse than the nominal performance, but the same uncertain closed-loop simulation shows a significant improvement over the nominal design.

Tap a line off the "v2" line and connect it to the negative input of this Add block. Do you want to open this example with your edits? The spring spring mass system simulink examples is proportional to the displacement of the mass,and the viscous damping force is proportional to the velocity of the mass. System identification may be performed using either time-domain or frequency-domain data, see the Introduction: System Identification page for further details. Insert two Add blocks from the Math Operations libraryone attached by a line to each of the Gain blocks. Connect the output of this gain block the damper force to the third input of the Mass 1 Add block.

Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance. Search Support Support MathWorks. Main Content. Filter coefficient in PID controller should not exceed Use the "uncertain real" ureal object to model the range of values that each parameter may take.

Main Content. Physical setup Design requirements Building the Model Open-loop response.

Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Select web site.

We note that that the governing equation for the RLC circuit has an analogous form to the mass-spring-damper mechanical system.

Open Mobile Search. Main Content.

Range 1 ,um. Here the uncertainty is specified as a percentage deviation from the nominal value.

In the above equation, is the state vectorweight having hypothyroidism set of variables representing the configuration of the system at time. Newton's third lawfor our purposes, states that if two bodies are in contact, then they experience the same magnitude contact force, just acting in opposite directions. Observing the above, we would like to improve the response of the suspension through the control of the suspension control force U. We note that that the governing equation for the RLC circuit has an analogous form to the mass-spring-damper mechanical system. Both forces oppose the motion of the mass and are, therefore, shown in the negative -direction.

Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance. Keep in mind that this is an estimation. Most operations in MATLAB can be performed on either the transfer function, the state-space model, or the zero-pole-gain form. To this end, we choose the position and velocity as our state variables. Connect the output of this Add block Damper 2's force to the fifth input of Mass 2's Add block. Label the input line "a1" for acceleration and the output line "v1" for velocity To add such a label, double click in the empty space just above the line.

## MATLAB Command

Do you want to open this example with your edits? No, overwrite the modified version Yes. Tuning this PID controller is easy when the physical parameters are known exactly.

Now applying KVL around the loop and using sppring sign conventions indicated in the diagram, we arrive at the following governing equation. If, for instance, we are interested in controlling the position of the mass, then the output equation is:. Suspension: Simulink Modeling. For time-invariant systems, the parameters or coefficients of the function are constant.

When applying this equation, it is best to construct a free-body diagram FBD of the sysetm showing all of the applied forces. Fortunately, over a sufficiently small operating range think tangent line near a curvethe dynamics of most systems are approximately linear.

Open Mobile Search.

Now, we will add in the forces acting on each mass. Select web site.

We then review some basic approaches to modeling sprung and electrical systems and show how to generate these models in MATLAB for further analysis. In these cases, use the following commands:. This is often a very reasonable assumption because the underlying physical laws themselves do not typically depend on time. If, for instance, we are interested in controlling the position of the mass, then the output equation is:. In other words, is typically some complicated function of the state and inputs. This input is negative, similar to Spring 1's force on Mass 1. When applying KVL, the source voltages are typically taken as positive and the load voltages are taken as negative.

System simulink examples force is equal to a constant, k1 times the difference X1-X2. Tap a line off the "v2" line and connect it to the negative input of this Add block. You may want to resize the gain blocks to view the contents. First, if the function does not depend explicitly on time, i. We note that that the governing equation for the RLC circuit has an analogous form to the mass-spring-damper mechanical system. Select web site. This force acts only on Mass 2, but depends on the ground profile, W.

You have a modified version of this example. To determine the state-space representation of the mass-spring-damper system, we must reduce the second-order governing equation to a set of two first-order differential equations. For time-invariant systems, the parameters or coefficients of the function are constant. Tap a line off the "x2" signal and connect it to the negative input of the new Add block. Fortunately, over a sufficiently small operating range think tangent line near a curvethe dynamics of most systems are approximately linear.

We will now consider a simple series combination of three passive electrical elements: a resistor, an inductor, and a capacitor, known as an RLC Circuit. Newton's law will be applied to each mass. Now applying KVL around the loop and using the sign conventions indicated in the diagram, we arrive at the following governing equation. Change the label of this Gain block to "Mass 1" by clicking on the word "Gain" underneath the block. Tutorials Contact. Insert two Gain blocks, from the Math Operations library one attached to the inputs of each of the integrator pairs.

Toggle Main Navigation. We can use a PID controller to generate the effort needed to change the position. Search Support Support MathWorks. Here we use two simple design requirements:. Tuning this PID controller is easy when the physical parameters are known exactly.

Soft: [1. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Select a Web Site Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers.

This plot shows that the nominal tuning is very sensitive to changes in mass or masa stiffnesswhile the robust tuning is essentially insensitive to these parameters. No, overwrite the modified version Yes. Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance. Search Support Support MathWorks. Documentation Help Center Documentation.

**ALSO READ: Keskusarkisto Hypothyroidism**

Suspension: Simulink Modeling. Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. The physical parameters must now be set. Insert an Add block below the Mass 1's first integrator. Edit it's Step Time to "0" and it's Final Value to "0". The system Gain is. Tap a line of the Step's output and connect it to the input of the Derivative block.

This step could represent the vehicle examples out of a pothole. Sprong a Derivative block from the Continuous library to the right of the W step block. Insert a Gain block to the left of this Add block and flip it left-to-right. Connect the output of this Gain block the spring force to the second input of the Mass 1 Add block. First, we will add in the force from Spring 1. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location. To simulate this system, first, an appropriate simulation time must be set.

Observe the significant performance degradation for some parameter combinations, with poorly damped oscillations and a long settling time. Range 1 ,um. Select the China site in Chinese or English for best site performance.

Based on your location, we recommend that you select:. Also, it is often the case that the outputs do systek directly depend on the inputs only through the state variablesin which spring mass system simulink examples is the zero matrix. Note also that corresponds to the position of the mass when the spring is unstretched. Insert a Gain block to the right of this Add block and connect the Add's output to the new Gain's input. The poles of the transfer function,are the roots of the denominator polynomial, i. Now we will add in the force from Spring 2. The Laplace transform of a time domain function,is defined below:.

No, overwrite the modified version Spting. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits simulink examples your location. Create an slTuner interface for tuning the "Controller" block in the Simulink model, and use systune to tune the PID gains and best meet the two requirements. You have a modified version of this example. Simulink Model of Mass-Spring-Damper System The mass-spring-damper depicted in Figure 1 is modeled by the second-order differential equation. This is confirmed by plotting the worst-case gain from to as a function of frequency.